The personal story of Wittgenstein resonated with the theory of white privilege introduced to me in one of my courses. The article states that he divested himself of his enormous family fortune and was inspired by Tolstoy, who actually ploughed the field by himself and went into novel writing en plein air. So, he can serve as a real example of getting rid of his privileges; that is a bit contradictory with his own statement about no sense to the ethics and religion--non-materialistic concepts. Wittgenstein got rid of the materialistic things to pursue teaching of the poor and living with the poor. He followed the non-sense path according to his early line of thought.
The other contradiction that struck me was his humanity on the one hand and corporal punishment on the other. Somehow, Makarenko comes to mind, who wrote a lot about appraisal and punishment. In his books, he took a strong stance against corporal punishment; even though there are debates about several incidents, but most scholars still believe that he was advocating for prevention rather than punishment. Dealing with difficult youth, Makarenko was criticized for a close to military discipline, use of labour as a main pedagogical technique; his collective pedagogy might not be in line with the modern thought. All of that leaves me wondering if the teaching shall differ with different audience.
In times of Makarenko, there was no ADHD diagnosis, so maybe he dealt with the youth using pedagogical rather than medicinal tools. Is ADHD just another way to make money, to label, to marginalize? I guess, his works might need re-reading and re-thinking.
The other contradiction that struck me was his humanity on the one hand and corporal punishment on the other. Somehow, Makarenko comes to mind, who wrote a lot about appraisal and punishment. In his books, he took a strong stance against corporal punishment; even though there are debates about several incidents, but most scholars still believe that he was advocating for prevention rather than punishment. Dealing with difficult youth, Makarenko was criticized for a close to military discipline, use of labour as a main pedagogical technique; his collective pedagogy might not be in line with the modern thought. All of that leaves me wondering if the teaching shall differ with different audience.
In times of Makarenko, there was no ADHD diagnosis, so maybe he dealt with the youth using pedagogical rather than medicinal tools. Is ADHD just another way to make money, to label, to marginalize? I guess, his works might need re-reading and re-thinking.