Many times I have to think about,
how to treat all those reference lists of so many readings to be covered while
I am doing journal entries. It is highly possible that every citation included
by an author hardly carries equal weight, as the motives of which differ and so
does the validity; thus it is highly essential to take differential treatment
upon the citations of a given article. The normal way I have been taking to make
journal entries when dealing with citation (and reference list) is marking down
the citation that is thought provoking, novel or that could be used as support
of argument for my writing, and that is all. It is not easy not to unwittingly
miss the citation out of motives of providing further reading for readers when
there are citations around, especially when some of which are not that valid
and essential and the motives of which are not that clear to me as I had not
enough knowledge of the motivation of citing behavior. The idea of treating
citation differentially as the motives differ would probably inspired me to analyze
the reason(s) and motive(s) behind each citation I would come across for the
next article to be studied.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.